date:May 17, 2012
ernment lab found Salmonella was produced on Jan. 3 and 4, 2012, yet Dec. 9, 2011 was chosen as the earliest production date for recall. This suggests that the contamination was present somewhere in the production environment for five months without being detected by the company's quality assurance program, Entis wrote.
As of May 11, at least 15 people in nine states and one person in Canada had been confirmed infected with Salmonella from contact with the contaminated dry dog food or from cont